Which of the following is NOT a component of the "Visually complete" metric benefits?

The "Visually complete" metric focuses on the perception of loading performance from the user’s perspective, which includes elements like how quickly users see content rendered on their screens.

The metric's primary benefits include accelerating performance improvements by identifying areas that cause delays in visual rendering, thus allowing teams to focus their optimization efforts effectively. It also provides visibility into the real user experience, giving insights on how actual users interact with the web content over time. Additionally, it combines with waterfall charts, which help visualize the sequence of loading events, allowing for a deeper understanding of what contributes to perceived performance.

Assessing server load capacity, however, is not a benefit associated with the "Visually complete" metric. Instead, server load capacity pertains to backend performance and scalability, focusing on the ability of a server to handle requests and not directly related to the user's perceived experience of page load times. Thus, while crucial for overall system performance analysis, it does not fit within the scope of the advantages that the "Visually complete" metric provides.