What should you select to capture specific types of requests in Real User Monitoring?

To capture specific types of requests in Real User Monitoring, selecting the option to capture fetch() requests and XmlHttpRequest is the most appropriate choice. This is because fetch() and XmlHttpRequest are key methods used to make asynchronous requests in modern web applications. By capturing these specific types of requests, you gain insights into the performance and behavior of these interactions, which can significantly impact user experience.

Capturing fetch() requests allows monitoring of modern JavaScript applications that utilize the Fetch API for network requests. Similarly, tracking XmlHttpRequest enables visibility into traditional AJAX calls still in use. By focusing on these specific request types, data gathered can help understand how well the application performs during interactions and where potential bottlenecks or issues might arise.

The other options do not effectively target the vital request types necessary for a comprehensive analysis of user interactions and application performance. For example, enabling all available settings could lead to unnecessary data collection that may obscure useful insights rather than clarify them. Selecting only non-async requests would miss out on important asynchronous interactions that are central to user experience. Ignoring capturing settings altogether would result in a lack of critical monitoring data, undermining the purpose of Real User Monitoring.