What is a major disadvantage of static thresholds?

Static thresholds are predetermined values that trigger alerts when metrics exceed or fall below these set points. A significant disadvantage of using static thresholds is that they do not adjust to the dynamic nature of modern environments, which are often subject to frequent changes in traffic loads, performance metrics, and operational conditions. As a result, these static thresholds might become irrelevant over time, requiring ongoing manual adjustments to remain effective. This manual effort can lead to oversights and delays in alert updates, potentially resulting in missed performance issues or false alarms.

In contrast, other options suggest benefits or misconceptions about static thresholds. For instance, while they may be easy to configure initially, the lack of adaptability necessitates considerable manual effort over time, making them less ideal in rapidly evolving scenarios. Also, the assertion that they adapt too quickly to changes is misleading; static thresholds are inherently rigid and do not adjust at all unless altered by a user. Furthermore, the suggestion that they do not alert on actions performed does not address their core functionality; rather, it overlooks the potential for false positives due to their static nature.